Medicines: Good Laboratory Practice
These regulations affect test facilities that conduct non-clinical regulatory studies which are designed to obtain data on the safety of new chemical or biological substances with respect to human and animal health or the environment. The regulations set out the principles that should be adhered to when planning, performing, monitoring, recording, reporting and archiving regulatory studies. In the EU and other parts of the world non-clinical regulatory studies are required for the registration of new chemicals and pharmaceuticals. The GLP regulations provide a quality framework which helps to assure regulatory authorities that the data from these studies can be relied upon for the purposes of risk assessment.
These regulations require that any test facility which conducts regulatory studies must be a member of the UK GLP Compliance Monitoring Programme. Test facilities are assessed and monitored through this programme.
We want to hear your views on what more we can do to deliver a simpler, less bureaucratic and more effective system, increase choice and opportunity, and maintain necessary safeguards and legal protections. You can find the regulations that relate to GLP to the left below.
Tell us what you think should happen to these regulations and why, being specific where possible:
- Should we scrap them altogether?
- Could their purpose be achieved in a non-regulatory way (eg through a voluntary code?) How?
- Could they be reformed, simplified or merged? How?
- Can we reduce their bureaucracy through better implementation? How?
- Can we make their enforcement less burdensome? How?
- Should they be left as they are?




